Sino-Russian Role in the 21st Century World Order

Authors

  • Hassan Farooq Ph.D. in IR, Department of International Relations & Political Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Khan Professor, Department of International Relations & Political Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-86.79

Keywords:

Unilateralist, multipolar, declinism, triumphalism, hegemony

Abstract

China and Russia have developed an underlying empathy on the transition of the contemporary US-led hegemonic world order. Since the dawn of the 21st century, the two Eurasian powers have been striving for transforming the global system to a multipolar world system. As Beijing and Moscow, along with other emerging powers were already weary of Washington’s unipolar moment and its self-proclaimed authority of overriding the entire international system. In the American worldwide hegemony, the rest of the nations; neither alone nor collectively could challenge its supremacy; as the political, economic and military dominance of the US was ascertained by its ascendency in the post-World war II established international organizations. However, during the past few decades the rapid rise of China; the resurgence of Russia and the relative decline of the US; evidently specify that the era of Pax-American is on the go. Moreover, the launching of Beijing sponsored transnational initiatives can be acknowledged as the pillars of a new multicentric global system in future. Hence, the dynamics of international politics are apparently heading towards the transition of the contemporary world system to a multipolar structure; where besides the US, China and Russia would also play significant role.

References

Alimov, R. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: Its role and place in the development of Eurasia. Journal of Eurasian studies, 9(2), 2018

Amadeo, K. US Trade Deficit by Country, With Current Statistics and Issues: Why America Cannot Just Make Everything It Needs, The Balance, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-imports-and-exports-components-and-statistics-3306270

Bhadrakumar, M. K. The new ‘NATO of the East’ takes shape: The SCO and China, Russia, and US Maneuvers. The Asia-Pacific Journal| Japan Focus, 5(8), 2007.

Bin, Y. Crouching army, hidden alliance?. Comparative Connections: A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, 20(3), 2019.

Blackwill, R. D. & Tellis, A. J. Revising US grand strategy toward China. Council on Foreign Relations, 2015.

Cheng, J. China’s regional strategy and challenges in East Asia. China Perspectives, 2, 2013.

Cliff, R. China’s military power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015

Dempsey, J. & Kulish, N. Merkel is set to greet, and then resist, Obama. The New York Times, 29(03), 2019. Accessed on October 10, 2019.

Etzioni, A. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: a case study of multifaceted containment. Asian Perspective, 40(2), 2016.

Fray, K. China’s leap forward: overtaking the US as world’s biggest economy. Financial Times, October 8, 2014.

Gilpin, R. & Gilpin, W. US Power Multinational Corp (Vol. 2). Basic Books, 1975.

Harold, S. W. Defeat, Not Merely Compete: China's View of Its Military Aerospace Goals and Requirements in Relation to the United States (No. RR2588). RAND Corp Santa Monica United States, 2018.

Heginbotham, E. Nixon, M., Morgan, F. E., Heim, J. L., Hagen, J., Li, S., ... & Frelinger, D. R. The US-China military scorecard: Forces, geography, and the evolving balance of power, 1996–2017. Rand Corporation, 2015.

Ignatius, D. What President Trump’s foreign policy will look like. Washington Post. 2016, November 9. Retrieved from https:// www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/ , accessed on October 08, 2019

Javaid, F. & Khan, M. A. The Role of Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with special reference to US Rivalry towards Central Asia.

International Research Journal of Social Sciences .4(3), 5, 2015.

Kyodo, China stole F-35 blueprints from Lockheed, Snowden data appears to show. The Japan Times, 2015, January 19. Retrieved on October 13, 2019 from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/01/19/

Lagarde, C. IMF could be based in Beijing in a decade. Reuters, 2017, July 24. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-imf-china-lagarde-idUSKBN1A922L, accessed on October 10, 2019

Layne, C. The US–Chinese power shift and the end of the Pax-Americana,

International Affairs, 94(1), 2018.

Layne, C. Avoiding a Sino-American Confrontation Why the US Should Accommodate a Rising China. Atlantisch Perspectief, (4), 2015.

Mahbubani, K., Can Asians Think?, Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd., 2010.

Mandelbaum, M., The case for Goliath: How America acts as the world's government in the twenty-first century. Public Affairs, 2005.

Marshal, X.V. Will China’s Belt and Road Initiative outdo the Marshall Plan? How China’s infrastructure projects around the world stack up against America’s plan to rebuild post-war Europe, The Economist. 2018, March 8. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2018/03/08/will-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-outdo-the-marshall-plan

McBride, J. Is ‘Made in China 2025’a Threat to Global Trade?. Council on Foreign Relations, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www. cfr. org/backgrounder/made-china-2025-threat-global-trade, accessed October 10, 2018.

Mearsheimer, J. J. The gathering storm: China’s challenge to US power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(4), 2010.

Miller, J. W., & Walker, M. China Dethrones Germany as Top Goods Exporter. The Wall Street Journal, A6, (2010).

Monaghan, A. China surpasses US as world's largest trading nation, The Guardian, 2014, January 10.

Notes, E. S. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. A new multilateral financial institution or a vehicle for China’s geostrategic goals. European Political Strategy Centre. European Political Strategy Centre, 1(4), 2015.

Park, I. "US–China competition in Asia-Pacific region: The AIIB and the New Global Order?, City College of New York, 2016. Retrieved https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e2be/a1372124c7ecfcb4f69af7ccf9c8f6e6ee96.pdf

Porter, P. The global village myth: distance, war, and the limits of power. Georgetown University Press, 2015.

Rauch, C. & Wurm, I. Making the world safe for power transition-Towards a conceptual combination of power transition theory and hegemony theory. Journal of Global Faultlines, 1(1), 2013.

Rein, S. The War for China's Wallet: Profiting from the New World Order,. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2017.

Schmucker, C. & Gnath, K. From the G8 to the G-20: reforming the global economic governance system. In European Yearbook of International Economic Law. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.

Sharma, S. D. China as the World’s Creditor and the United States as the World’s Debtor: Implications for Sino-American Relations, China Perspectives, 4, 2010.

Sutter, R. An Emerging China-Russia Axis?: Implications for the United States in an Era of Strategic Competition. Statement before the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. 2019. Retrieved from https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Sutter_Testimony.pdf

Uchitelle, L. The US still leans on the military-industrial complex. New York Times, 22, 2017.

US Department of Defense. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. 2019.

West, D. & Lansang, C. Global manufacturing scorecard: How the US compares to 18 other nations. Brookings, July, 10. 2018.

Wolf, M. Three years and new fault lines threaten. Financial Times, 13, 2010.

Yilmaz, S. & Li, B. The BRI-Led Globalization and Its Implications for East Asian Regionalization. Chinese Political Science Review, 2020.

Zakaria, F. We have to look beyond the madness’, The Washington Post, 2018, September 6. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/

opinions/global-opinions/, accessed on October 08, 2019

Downloads

Published

2020-11-28

How to Cite

Hassan Farooq, & Muhammad Khan. (2020). Sino-Russian Role in the 21st Century World Order. Central Asia, 86(Summer), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-86.79